Discussion about this post

User's avatar
matt's avatar

Thoughtful take! I was a bit frustrated reading that article when it came out since I think it focused more on the woes of capitalism versus actually critically looking at perfumery and fragrance as a hobby beyond surface level. Granted, it did give a look at the hobby from someone outside of it with passing interest. If this is the first impression and takeaway, then there are probably some opportunities for better educational outreach, etc. I saw luckyscent just started a video series looking at trends, which I think is a good step forward. There are some fragrance podcasts out there too.

All art is commercialized to an extent, (artists need to survive too), and our societal framework is based around capitalism for the most part for better or for worse, so it feels a bit insincere to pin that on fragrances as a whole. However, with the segment being the fastest growing beauty segment, there most definitely are brands taking advantage and dumping huge amounts of releases on the market. It can be difficult to filter through all the *noise.* My response to this is to shift my personal focus to smaller indie brands with often a single perfumer/owner, and even with a preliminary pass for a list I've got well over 50 brands to try.

There are some concerning 'trends and attitudes' in the fragrance-sphere in recent years, yes. For me, the biggest problem is the huge push that any fragrance that doesn't have nuclear performance is not worthwhile, and this is often coming from the younger crowd. I understand the concern that fragrance is expensive and they want to feel like they are getting their money's worth, but I think what is being lost in the plot is that fragrance is both a luxury item and an art form. At its core, especially with independent and some niche houses, it's often about creating olfactory experiences, recreating memories, feelings, places, etc. Just like these fleeting feelings and memories, these fragrance moments are ephemeral. What makes them precious is precisely that they don't last forever...

Encouraging people (especially young people) to explore and drop any demands or constraints around fragrance is a great first step. I do hope at some point the hobby will be large enough to coordinate local sample swap clubs or even groups hosting smell parties and the like, much like listening parties for music.

Expand full comment
Alison Jenkins's avatar

My children were both into wearing fragrance from being very young. The elder like a drop of Shalimar on his bedding . He said it smelt like me but better.

The younger found ‘his’ signature in his late teens. Prada Infusion d’Homme. When it d/ced I scoured dept stores, discounters, preloved sites & anywhere else I could think of.

That brings me on to part of why perfume as an art form fails itself. Its own history has been deleted.

Music, painting, sculpture, writing etc all have history that is largely present. It can be seen, read, heard & be appreciated. We can critique it for ourselves. Consume it to develop a sense of what came next, why today’s medium is how it is & where it developed from.

This isn’t the case with perfumery. The fragrances of the past have been discontinued. The Osmoteque keeps reconstructions & vintages but is open to only those who can travel there & then get access. I understand LA has a less austere version but again limited access.

The perfumers palette is being decimated by regulations. Consumers are being denied the opportunity to decide to take a risk & smelling fragrance with real oak moss etc. Yet far more risky substances are sold to the public & tacitly approved of by governments. Yeh fags & booze kill huge numbers each year but raise taxes. Stick a warning on them & let people choose to become addicted.

Death by perfume is a minuscule risk, largely by drinking it. I’ve searched & cannot find a single report anywhere if death by wearing perfume. Yet the public cannot choose for themselves.

Without a history fragrance is a consumer product, & at the whim of the perfume houses & government can be changed or killed altogether.

Also there is no medium where scent can be appreciated away from the bottle. There is no smellovision or virtual headset where historic scents can be accessed.

Collecting vintage fragrances is incredibly expensive & risky.

My boys are no longer of the smellmaxxers age group but still have a passing interest in scent.

Maybe these current schoolboys will actually forge careers in perfume & be the ones to create what fragrance needs to be recognised as an art

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts